24-11-2016, 08:33 AM
www.borinsky.co.uk Jeffrey Borinsky www.becg.tv
100 Voices that made the BBC – The Birth of TV
|
24-11-2016, 08:33 AM
www.borinsky.co.uk Jeffrey Borinsky www.becg.tv
24-11-2016, 09:34 AM
Yet another "history" implying that the most significant precursor to modern television was Baird's activities with no mention of the A.A. Campbell-Swinton who conceived modern television decades before it actually arrived.
Peter
24-11-2016, 11:45 AM
Baird raised awareness, but otherwise his only significant contribution was the near real time film camera + scanner. He was perusing Victorian techniques in a clueless manner while others working on electronic display (CRT wasn't a problem and existed in essence before Baird did anything) and the more difficult problem of the camera target.
The Russian and German work is often ignored. The USA makes much of Philo Farnsworth, who had more clue than Baird, though his camera was a technological dead end because as you double resolution it's half as sensitive (or worse) each time as there was no charge storage. The main western development was RCA/EMI (historically related via both Victor Talking Machine/HMV and Marconi), based on Russian work. Philo & RCA were following the A.A. Campbell-Swinton vision. Baird was a hardly educated entrepreneurial less successful version of Edison, tinkering. The Baird company eventually sent him home.
24-11-2016, 11:53 AM
While I have no brief for Baird his salesmanship, for want of a better term, played a signifcant part in ensuring we had a TV service. He badgered the BBC and paved the way for other companies to treat TV seriously. He also gave the first demonstration of TV in January 1926.
www.borinsky.co.uk Jeffrey Borinsky www.becg.tv
24-11-2016, 12:11 PM
Lots of people here know this, but some might not, also most visitors will not.
BBC Says: Quote: But the problem remained of how to break an original image into small sections so that they could be transmitted separately, though simultaneously, before being ‘reassembled’ at a distant receiver. And it was in Britain that a ‘mechanical’ approach to this problem was pursued with the most striking results. In 1924, a young Scottish engineer, John Logie Baird, developed a way of passing a beam of light through a rapidly spinning disc punched with holes, so that a simple image could be ‘scanned’, transmitted, and reconverted It's nonsense! It was also being done in USA. He initially was only copying Victorian era Nipcow https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paul_Gottlieb_Nipkow https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nipkow_disk https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mechanical_television Mechanical TV was a curiosity that could use AM transmitters after hours. Kits were sold in USA also. It wasn't a Baird invention. Electronic Television Quote:In 1907, Russian scientist Boris Rosing used a CRT in the receiving end of an experimental video signal to form a picture. He managed to display simple geometric shapes onto the screen, which marked the first time that CRT technology was used for what is now known as television.[20]In 1897, J. J. Thomson, an English physicist, in his three famous experiments was able to deflect cathode rays, a fundamental function of the modern Cathode Ray Tube (CRT). The earliest version of the CRT was invented by the German physicist Karl Ferdinand Braun in 1897 and is also known as the Braun tube.] It was a cold-cathode diode, a modification of the Crookes tube with a phosphor-coated screen.A cathode ray tube was successfully demonstrated as a displaying device by the German Professor Max Dieckmann in 1906, his experimental results were published by the journal Scientific American in 1909.[23] In 1908 Alan Archibald Campbell-Swinton, fellow of the Royal Society (UK), published a letter in the scientific journal Nature in which he described how "distant electric vision" could be achieved by using a cathode ray tube (or "Braun" tube) as both a transmitting and receiving device He expanded on his vision in a speech given in London in 1911 and reported in The Times[26] and the Journal of the Röntgen Society. In a letter to Nature published in October 1926, Campbell-Swinton also announced the results of some "not very successful experiments" he had conducted with G. M. Minchin and J. C. M. Stanton. They had attempted to generate an electrical signal by projecting an image onto a selenium-coated metal plate that was simultaneously scanned by a cathode ray beam. These experiments were conducted before March 1914, when Minchin died.[31] They were later repeated in 1937 by two different teams, H. Miller and J. W. Strange from EMI,[32] and H. Iams and A. Rose from RCA Both teams succeeded in transmitting "very faint" images with the original Campbell-Swinton's selenium-coated plate. Although others had experimented with using a cathode ray tube as a receiver, the concept of using one as a transmitter was novel. The first cathode ray tube to use a hot cathode was developed by John B. Johnson (who gave his name to the term Johnson noise) and Harry Weiner Weinhart of Western Electric, and became a commercial product in 1922. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of...television Dutch Experimenters used Nipkow disk cameras with CRT displays when Baird was messing with disk and mirror displays. Rosing had filed his first patent on a television system in 1907, featuring a very early cathode ray tube as a receiver, and a mechanical device as a transmitter. Its demonstration in 1911, based on an improved design, was the first world's demonstration of TV of any kind. In 1926, Hungarian engineer Kálmán Tihanyi designed a television system utilizing fully electronic scanning and display elements and employing the principle of "charge storage" within the scanning (or "camera") tube On December 25, 1926, Kenjiro Takayanagi demonstrated a TV system with a 40-line resolution that employed a CRT display at Hamamatsu Industrial High School in Japan. Why didn't Baird use a CRT from the very start for the receiver? Cost cutting? Ignorance? The USPTO was broken in 19th C, with Edison pursuing Film makers, for patents he should never have had (later invalidated). USPTO is STILL broken. Armstrong & RCA should not have had patents for Superhet and FM, which are based on mathematics. Quote:Vladimir Zworykin was also experimenting with the cathode ray tube to create and show images. While working for Westinghouse Electric in 1923, he began to develop an electronic camera tube. But in a 1925 demonstration, the image was dim, had low contrast and poor definition, and was stationary. Zworykin's imaging tube never got beyond the laboratory stage. But RCA, which acquired the Westinghouse patent, asserted that the patent for Farnsworth's 1927 image dissector was written so broadly that it would exclude any other electronic imaging device. Thus RCA, on the basis of Zworykin's 1923 patent application, filed a patent interference suit against Farnsworth. The U.S. Patent Office examiner disagreed in a 1935 decision, finding priority of invention for Farnsworth against Zworykin. Farnsworth claimed that Zworykin's 1923 system would be unable to produce an electrical image of the type to challenge his patent. Zworykin received a patent in 1928 for a color transmission version of his 1923 patent application,[48] he also divided his original application in 1931.[49] Zworykin was unable or unwilling to introduce evidence of a working model of his tube that was based on his 1923 patent application. In September 1939, after losing an appeal in the courts and determined to go forward with the commercial manufacturing of television equipment, RCA agreed to pay Farnsworth US$1 million over a ten-year period, in addition to license payments, to use Farnsworth's patents.[50][51] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of...television https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vladimir_K._Zworykin Quote:Vladimir Kosmich Zworykin (Russian: Влади́мир Козьми́ч Зворы́кин, Vladimir Koz'mich Zvorykin; July 29 [O.S. July 17] 1888 – July 29, 1982) was a Russian inventor, engineer, and pioneer of television technology. Educated in Russia and in France, he spent most of his life in the United States. Zworykin invented a television transmitting and receiving system employing cathode ray tubes. He played a role in the practical development of television from the early thirties, including charge storage-type tubes, infrared image tubes and the electron microscope Fax is the precursor to TV and was also transmitted on MW AM after radio programs as alternative to Nipkow / Baird systems in USA in early 1930s. It was used commercially on wires from 1856. Quote:Facsimile transmission systems for still photographs pioneered methods of mechanical scanning of images in early 19th century. Alexander Bain introduced the facsimile machine in 1843 to 1846. Frederick Bakewell demonstrated a working laboratory version in 1851. The first practical facsimile system, working on telegraph lines, was developed and put into service by Giovanni Caselli from 1856 onward. So how important is Baird?
25-11-2016, 01:29 PM
Brilliant reply Michael.
Over the years I have had many discussions about Baird and his use of "Victorian" Technology when with a little research he could have come up with a better system. I was never sure about his technical ability but give him his due he was persistent and I am sure did help to alter the BBC's blinkered outlook on their "Radio only" obsession.
25-11-2016, 01:42 PM
Trevor's got the point I was making. Whatever Baird's technical weaknesses (which were many) he was the guy who pushed the BBC and this country into TV. Without his spur would EMI have recruited Shoenberg et al and set them to work on TV? This is the sort of counterfactual history that's impossible to write. Other companies such as Cossor and Scophony were certainly experimenting with TV. Could any UK company other than EMI have achieved the undoubtedly successful results? EMI couldn't have done it without form Marconi-EMI. For 2 main reasons, Marconi's transmitter technology which was the very best** and Marconi's access to a lot of RCA patents.
**Baird's vision transmitter made by Metropolitan Vickers was also of great value since it formed the basis of the Chain Home radar TX. Its continuously pumped demountable output valves were tougher and more suited to the rough condtions of radar.
www.borinsky.co.uk Jeffrey Borinsky www.becg.tv
25-11-2016, 03:41 PM
I think Baird only made a contribution with 30 line tv. If I am interpreting events correctly the Baird Company's efforts in 240 line tv were actually led by A.D.G. West.
Peter
25-11-2016, 03:53 PM
The 240 line system was developed after Baird the man was pushed out of the company. Much of the 240 line kit was actually made by the German company Fernseh, which was a subsidiary of the Baird company.
www.borinsky.co.uk Jeffrey Borinsky www.becg.tv
25-11-2016, 06:30 PM
(This post was last modified: 25-11-2016, 06:32 PM by Mike Watterson.)
(25-11-2016, 01:42 PM)ppppenguin Wrote: Trevor's got the point I was making. Whatever Baird's technical weaknesses (which were many) he was the guy who pushed the BBC and this country into TV. Without his spur would EMI have recruited Shoenberg et al and set them to work on TV? "What if" is impossible, but the "time" of TV had arrived. Perhaps it might have been two years later in the UK, but like Broadcast Radio became inevitable when hard valves were developed, and rebuilding after WWI, TV was inevitable. It was happening in USA, Mexico, Japan, Russia, Germany, France. The BBC would not have wanted to be "left out". It's impossible to say if Baird really helped or not. It's unfair to the real developers of TV and real Engineers to credit him with inventing TV or being an Engineer. |
Users browsing this thread: |
1 Guest(s) |