19-05-2024, 05:15 PM
The main aim is so that people can understand what an AVO 163 or Mullard HST or any of the modern curve tracers need to do, as as our fav Penguin Jeffery remarked you only need some PSUs.
BUT it can't be emphasised enough that except maybe at VHF/UHF, the handiest valve tester is the equipment it's for. So I may do some posts on the different valve functions in a radio, amp, record-player, transmitter and tape-recorder, indicating what can be measured to decide if the valve needs replaced.
A valve tester or curve tracer is useful if designing from scratch, especially if the valve is plentiful but lacking data, or to help guess what a random valve with missing markings might be.
I used them a lot by visiting a TV shop in 1960s because I was ignorant and didn't know how to tell measuring the valve in the radio. Historically used more for production, design or checking new stock than repairing sets, because people knew how to repair and up to the mid 1960s had stocks of new valves.
People also write now about using them to match valves for amps, either push-pull or stereo etc. That wasn't done historically. It's a bad design that needs parts selected on test. Some designs relied on negative feedback. Others, especially radio transmitters with paralleled valves would have bias adjustable for each one. On some sets you took off one top cap alternately and set the quiescent cathode current. Other models you measured cathode resistors or opened test links to the output transformer.
An AVO VCM163 is nice to have, but it takes a lot space. May need a lot of specialist restoration and really not used much in repair or restoration. I've not taken my uTracer out of its case since I last got a mysterious rare Russian Rod Pentode a few years ago!
The ad-hoc PSU with leakage and PIV test supplies is a handy general piece of kit, so I'm building one anyway. It certainly will be better for valve testing than some old cheap testers or the specialist Mullard HST (which is an ingenious piece of kit for a valve factory!).
BUT it can't be emphasised enough that except maybe at VHF/UHF, the handiest valve tester is the equipment it's for. So I may do some posts on the different valve functions in a radio, amp, record-player, transmitter and tape-recorder, indicating what can be measured to decide if the valve needs replaced.
A valve tester or curve tracer is useful if designing from scratch, especially if the valve is plentiful but lacking data, or to help guess what a random valve with missing markings might be.
I used them a lot by visiting a TV shop in 1960s because I was ignorant and didn't know how to tell measuring the valve in the radio. Historically used more for production, design or checking new stock than repairing sets, because people knew how to repair and up to the mid 1960s had stocks of new valves.
People also write now about using them to match valves for amps, either push-pull or stereo etc. That wasn't done historically. It's a bad design that needs parts selected on test. Some designs relied on negative feedback. Others, especially radio transmitters with paralleled valves would have bias adjustable for each one. On some sets you took off one top cap alternately and set the quiescent cathode current. Other models you measured cathode resistors or opened test links to the output transformer.
An AVO VCM163 is nice to have, but it takes a lot space. May need a lot of specialist restoration and really not used much in repair or restoration. I've not taken my uTracer out of its case since I last got a mysterious rare Russian Rod Pentode a few years ago!
The ad-hoc PSU with leakage and PIV test supplies is a handy general piece of kit, so I'm building one anyway. It certainly will be better for valve testing than some old cheap testers or the specialist Mullard HST (which is an ingenious piece of kit for a valve factory!).







