23-04-2022, 03:08 PM
(This post was last modified: 23-04-2022, 03:09 PM by ppppenguin.)
It's debateable. If you connect a Freeview box to a monochrome TV then it may be correct to have a colour licence. It's actually a fair bit of work to watch in monochrome only. No mon osets have a SCART connector and very few have any kind of AV input. All are over 30 years old. Hence you need a Freeview box with a modulator. They aren't very common.
However all these delicately argued points are irrelevant. While I have no way of proving what I'm about to write, I strongly believe it's official policy not to pursue B&W licence holders. The lost revenue is about 4000 x (150-50) or about £400K per year. i know my numbers aren't accurate but it makes no difference to my conclusion. It just ain't worth working hard to recover under half a million quid from a total licence fee income of a few billion. Especially if you end up coming heavy on a few old eccentrics who genuinely are watching in B&W.
In past years when this subject has arisen I've actually talked directly to people from TV licencing. When I gently suggest what I've just written they gently change the subject. They couldn't possibly admit to it.
In a few years, if the licence fee continues to exist at all (let's not debate that subject here, it will all too easily get out of hand) they may abolish the B&W licence. Or if it isn't casuing too much trouble to keep it, then why bother. As an aside you can't buy or renew a B&W licence online: https://www.tvlicensing.co.uk/faqs/FAQ236
All this reminds me that at some point I'll need a get a licence for the BECG. Don't need one yet as we aren't aren't operating any receivers on the premises yet. But we don't want to fall foul of the rules. I wonder if we'll get a nastygram from TV Licencing threatening us with a plague of lice (or whatever) for not having one.
However all these delicately argued points are irrelevant. While I have no way of proving what I'm about to write, I strongly believe it's official policy not to pursue B&W licence holders. The lost revenue is about 4000 x (150-50) or about £400K per year. i know my numbers aren't accurate but it makes no difference to my conclusion. It just ain't worth working hard to recover under half a million quid from a total licence fee income of a few billion. Especially if you end up coming heavy on a few old eccentrics who genuinely are watching in B&W.
In past years when this subject has arisen I've actually talked directly to people from TV licencing. When I gently suggest what I've just written they gently change the subject. They couldn't possibly admit to it.
In a few years, if the licence fee continues to exist at all (let's not debate that subject here, it will all too easily get out of hand) they may abolish the B&W licence. Or if it isn't casuing too much trouble to keep it, then why bother. As an aside you can't buy or renew a B&W licence online: https://www.tvlicensing.co.uk/faqs/FAQ236
All this reminds me that at some point I'll need a get a licence for the BECG. Don't need one yet as we aren't aren't operating any receivers on the premises yet. But we don't want to fall foul of the rules. I wonder if we'll get a nastygram from TV Licencing threatening us with a plague of lice (or whatever) for not having one.
www.borinsky.co.uk Jeffrey Borinsky www.becg.tv