30-01-2016, 12:53 PM
(30-01-2016, 11:09 AM)ppppenguin Wrote: The output is harder. Again it's TF hybrid with a NE5532. I don't think you can do a balanced floating output without more components. Electronic balanced floating outputs are tricky things, with positive feedback to ensure that when you ground one leg the other leg doubles in amplitude. More likely it's balanced around ground but not floating. So you can't really ground one leg of the output. Easy enough to check this with a signal passing through. Just ground one leg and see what happens. Hence I'll be taking an unbalanced output between one leg and ground. This also halves the amplitude of the output so hope the gains presets have enough range to compensate.
Yes, most are non-floating types in my experience. Just an inverter taking a copy of the "hot" signal to produce the "cold". As you say, ignore the cold and take the hot, albeit at -6dB. Saves design effort - saves making sure there are no RFI injection issues.
You're right that grounding the cold or hot of a quasi-floating output will give the correct amplitude, albeit with a 6dB loss of headroom, which is totally academic here because the single-ended inputs have already lost 6dB headroom unless they are using 30-0-30 for their op-amps . If you ground the cold at the remote end rather than at the router output end, you'll get the advantages of ground noise cancellation - which probably isn't an issue here as I think(?) the destinations are adjacent to the router, but is worth mentioning for long cable runs...
I've a nasty feeling that any gain tweak presets in the router might only be fine-tuning types - ±1dB or thereabouts. Presumably the destinations have input level tweaks? Not sure what you're using, but I'd expect a non-pro modulator to have an adjustment and some means of indicating the level - especially when it's expecting to be used with a wide range of sources?
Anyway, you're definitely getting there