26-10-2018, 06:33 PM
(This post was last modified: 26-10-2018, 06:35 PM by Murphyv310.)
I agree Jeffrey but the way the Chinese operate in some quarters is unfair to say the least.
Leaving out our own story I agree that safety has to be paramount and with a copy who is to say that item IS safe? The other issue is how do the relevant authorities get alerted that a particular item like this piece of test equipment is the genuine article when shipped and unloaded. It could have been tested, to whose standards though, it begs the question that we buy an item at a quarter of it's value, why? Because we only see the price not that its fake or unsafe. Again the same with Emma's designs and textiles. Oh well she's doing just great as an Art teacher and pupil guidance.
Leaving out our own story I agree that safety has to be paramount and with a copy who is to say that item IS safe? The other issue is how do the relevant authorities get alerted that a particular item like this piece of test equipment is the genuine article when shipped and unloaded. It could have been tested, to whose standards though, it begs the question that we buy an item at a quarter of it's value, why? Because we only see the price not that its fake or unsafe. Again the same with Emma's designs and textiles. Oh well she's doing just great as an Art teacher and pupil guidance.
